[1] the main “voices” exhibition
first off, this was my favorite and what I thought was the most enjoyable exhibition in the greensboro historical museum. the entrance to it had both stairs and a ramp so it was handicap accessible. I thought the first room you enter works fairly well for its purpose of introducing you to what the exhibit is, although the time line that flows in a circle doesn’t really connect well with the pictures on the walls. still though, I think there is a clear pathway that leads you around the room then into the next. one thing I notices were the lights near the floors that dimly lit the walkway all throughout the exhibition. the rooms were, in general, all softly lit, using all artificial light, so this worked to keep the walkway safe. traveling through the exhibit, I thought it was very maze like, but gave you a good sense of where you were supposed to go while still leading you through greensboro’s history. there were many small walls that protruded out from the main walls, which usually separated a picture or diagram from one another. the color scheme was pleasing, sticking to mainly deep red, green, orange, and blue. the colors divided time periods as you traveled through the exhibit, however there were two sections that were bright blue and yellow, that really stuck out from the color scheme. also, in the second room where the covered wagon was, there were wall hangings of bark that unsuccessfully tried to make you feel like you were in the wilderness. in another room that was painted brick red, there was a hanging that had neon lights on it that I thought really distracted from the rest of the things in the room and didn’t flow with it at all. some rooms had soft music playing that wasn’t too loud like they were in the “gate city” exhibition. as far as furniture goes, there are benches in nearly every room of the exhibit. some are strategically placed, however some are just in the center of the room and disrupts the circulation. all in all, I thought the “voices” exhibition worked very well in terms of the principles of design.
[2] the period rooms and pottery display
I also enjoyed the period rooms and pottery display, although I think there were more problems concerning their design than there were in the “voices” exhibition. the room is a combination of a half circle and a rectangle, which makes it somewhat confusing to circulate through. when you walk through the doors, you have the option of going either straight, right or left. either way you pick, it doesn’t leady you through the exhibit in an organized manner. the front perimeter of the room is where the period rooms are, that are dimly lit so its hard to see the details of the rooms. also, it is hard to differentiate the labels that are next to each room. they are just stuck on the wall in between the frames of each room and don’t specify which room they have information about. you are then thrown into the pottery display, with no transition from one to the other. there is a center display case in the center of the room that also has a tv on it. the sound from the tv carried over to the period rooms because the spaces were connected, which distracts the viewer from the rooms. there were also two benches facing the tv where you could rest and view the display cases from. the tv faces the back of the room, which at first I didn’t like but the more I thought about it I decided it worked with the space. if you eliminated the period rooms from the equation, the tv would provide visual information, as well as vocalizing information to the rest of the room that you don’t necessarily have to view on the tv to understand. the pottery displays were balanced on either side of the inner rectangle, and were lit better than the period rooms.
[3] the “gate city” exhibition
to me, the “gate city” exhibition was a mess of sound, material, finish, balance, and many other things. the steps leading to the exhibition create a feeling of elegance and sophistication, but once you enter the exhibition there is an overwhelming amount of textures and sound. your line of vision is first directed to the fake tree that stands at the center of the room, which is probably the least important element. the floor used multiple materials, including wood, brick, different forms of tile, and sand around the tree. each buildings façade had a different theme and finish, which was also very overwhelming. it was very dim in the room, and there was some sort of square on the ceiling that leaked the smallest amount of natural light, although it didn’t effect the lighting. that might add something interesting to the space if it was utilized in the right way. the doorways branching out from the center space were relatively narrow, and could become crowded and awkward if there was a large group in the room. the “theater” was even dimmer than the other spaces, even though there was nothing being played on the screen. there were three different types of chairs that were used in this space, all being movable. whether it wasn’t in the budget to get stable seating or it was a detail that was looked over, it made the room look disorganized and uninviting. the only redeeming part of the “gate city” exhibition was the “hotel” room. it is closed off from the rest of gate city, however it is open to all the noise traveling from the lobby and all three levels. the room had matching furniture and a matching color palate that worked somewhat well together. the front desk was the prominent feature in the room, and it also had a small room connected to the larger one. however, the room had a relatively low ceiling and the air vent was very noticeable, even though they painted it the color of the walls.
[4] the traveling exhibition entitled “down home”
this exhibition was very different than the others because it was much smaller and was located in the lobby. it doesn’t have walls that section it off, but rather creates a room by positioning the display cases in a rectangle. this allows all the noise from the lobby to enter the space, which makes it difficult to hear the tv that plays information and personal stories from members of the jewish community. the items in the display cases were very helpful and gave me a small peak at the jewish community and their artifacts, however the area doesn’t immerse you in the story it is trying to tell you. this is due to the lack of enclosure and the small amount of material. the main focus in the space was on the dress. it wasn’t encased, only blocked off by glass, and it was raised off the floor. there were panels of information and pictures that stood next to the display cases, and also worked to better enclose the space. they didn’t go with any particular case, but gave more information about the jewish community. unlike the other exhibitions, the “down home” exhibit was mainly naturally lit from the windows that are in the lobby. this creates some glare on the glass cases, but overall creates a more open feeling. there really isn’t any sense of direction to how you are supposed to travel around the exhibition, but it isn’t as critical because it is such a small area. I felt like there wasn’t a connection with the exhibit and the museum, but it felt more like the display was just set in the lobby with not a lot of thought.
[5] gift shop
the main things I noticed that they sold in the gift show was pottery, books and little trinkets. I also noticed as I was leaving that they sold scarves, which seemed out of place in the store. they also had some greensboro historical museum paraphernalia. I think this shows that they not only display objects, but also believe in them enough to sell them.